• easyjet1
  • show n 1
  • show n 3
  • show 5
  • ESPA – easyJet Switzerland Pilots Association
  • AEROPERS – Airline Pilots Association
  • AEROPERS – Airline Pilots Association
  • SIPA – Swiss Independent Pilot Association

PRESS RELEASE OF THE EUROPEAN COCKPIT ASSOCIATION, BRUSSELS, 19 april 2016

With its decision to tentatively approve traffic rights for “Norwegian Air International” (NAI) the US Department of Transportation (DoT), together with the European Commission (EC) have opened the door and de facto laid out the welcome mat for “Flags of Convenience” in aviation. The US regulator’s decision has been pending for two years amid greater scrutiny on Norwegian’s employment practices and business model. The tentative approval now ignores the key provision of Article 17bis in the EU-US Open Skies agreement, and disregards important facts about NAI’s employment practices.

“This decision is an own goal”, says Dirk Polloczek, President of the European Cockpit Association (ECA). “In opening the door to this flag of convenience scheme, the US DoT and the EC have chosen to undermine their own airline industries and destroy decent jobs and the social rights of their own citizens. They appear instead to have looked out for the interests of a few CEOs that want to deny workers their rights and make a ‘quick buck’ at the expense of the rest of the responsible industry and society.”

He continues: “We fundamentally disagree with this decision, and will continue to work together with our colleagues in European and US aviation to challenge it and to argue that this tentative approval should not be made permanent, unless and until Norwegian has made clear and satisfactory commitments as to how and where NAI employs its flight and cabin crew.”

Despite already having trans-Atlantic flight rights from anywhere in Europe to the US, Norwegian chose Ireland to establish a new subsidiary – NAI – to avoid the social standards of Norway and to enable the company to use a very questionable hiring model.

The carrier has designed a scheme to engage pilots and cabin crew via a Singaporean postbox company and claims to base them in Bangkok. In fact, most of the pilots are based in Europe and operate out of European airports across the North Atlantic, but without being subject to relevant EU employee regulation. Cabin crew are from countries with very low labour standards engaged without residency or work permits in Europe.

The airline claims that NAI’s permit will “create thousands of new jobs”, omitting the fact that most are already part of the transatlantic operation running the last two years – based on a temporary Norwegian exemption – and that NAI’s ‘employment’ scheme will destroy many more quality European and US jobs than it creates..

“If you want to see the future of aviation, as the US DoT and the EC plan it, just look at today’s maritime industry. It is a world where operators choose to be regulated by countries with the weakest or even non-existent rules. Where the standards that have been developed over decades are sold out. Where companies feel free to place themselves beyond the taxes and obligations of the markets they benefit from”, says Jon Horne, Vice-President of ECA. “We will not just stand by and watch while our own government officials again fire the starting gun on this race to the bottom.”

For further information, please contact:

Dirk Polloczek, ECA President, Tel: +32 2 705 32 93

Jon Horne, ECA Vice-President, Tel: +32 2 705 32 93

IMMEDIATE RELEASE BY IFALPA, NEW ORLEANS, 16 APRIL 2016

NEW ORLEANS, USA – Following the US Department of Transportation’s tentative approval on Friday for Norwegian Air International (NAI) to fly to the United States, today the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA) at its 71st Annual Conference has unanimously adopted the fol-lowing Conference Statement:

On behalf of the 100,000 pilots in 100 Member Associations, the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations states its extreme disappointment in the decision of the U.S. Department of Transportation to tentatively approve the application of Norwegian Air International for a foreign air carrier permit.

NAI is a flag-of-convenience carrier that was established to undermine employ-ment standards. Despite the fact that the US – European Union Air Transport Agreement was designed to deter such business models from operating in the transatlantic market, the US and EU authorities propose to open the door to NAI.

We call on both, the US DOT as well as the European Commission, to reconsider this tentative decision and to either deny NAI’s application or require NAI to commit to assure that either full US or European employment standards are ap-plied to its employees.

For further information please contact Captain Martin Chalk, IFALPA President, at +44 7432 616 119 or martinchalk@ifalpa.org, or Ms. Anna Lou, IFALPA Communications & Marketing Coordinator, at +1 514 419 1191 or annalou@ifalpa.org.

PRESS RELEASE OF THE EUROPEAN COCKPIT ASSOCIATION, BRUSSELS, 18 February 2016

As the new EASA Flight Time Limitations (FTL) rules (EU Reg. 83/2014) come into effect today, the industry shifts to a fully harmonised European set of rules aimed at preventing air crew fatigue from constituting a risk to flight safety. At the same time, as any air operator is obliged to proactively manage the safety risks associated with fatigue, both in the cockpit and the cabin, simple compliance with the new rules will not be sufficient anymore.

However, with low levels of understanding of the complex new rules, diverging interpretations, and only slow progress towards genuine fatigue risk management at company level, even after a transition period of 2 years, many operators and national authorities are not ready yet for the shift.

After a controversial legislative process in 2013, where adoption by the European Parliament was not certain due to concerns about an insufficient scientific basis, the new rules will now cover all aspects of fatigue risk mitigation, including those which previously were still covered by national legislation, such as time-zone crossing, sleep-disrupting flight schedules (e.g. early morning starts) etc.

“Moving to a harmonised EU-wide system is a logical step to do as pilot fatigue does not stop at national borders” says ECA President Dirk Polloczek. “Therefore, strong scientifically-based FTL rules are a must and we look forward to the operational data-driven scientific review that EASA is mandated to carry out within the next 3 years. This is particularly important for highly fatiguing night flights, sleep-disrupting schedules, and standby rules, where we consider the new rules must be improved.“

As a stand-alone act, the introduction of the new FTL rules will not be able to fully mitigate the risks of fatigue in the cockpit and cabin,” says Didier Moraine Chairman of the ECA FTL Working Group. “This is why setting up a robust fatigue risk management system inside each company is not only a legal obligation, but also an absolute must for any company that is serious about identifying its own fatigue related risks and then actively mitigating them.”

“Due to their complexity, the new rules constitute a very concrete and immediate challenge” continues Moraine. “Interpreting them correctly and in a harmonised manner will remain difficult not only for the companies and national authorities, but also for the individual pilots. This is why ECA developed an online FTL Calculator – allowing each pilot to calculate the legal limits for their daily flight duties. Crucially, we trust in EASA to work closely with all stakeholders to ensure correct and uniform interpretation and implementation of the new rules.”

“As our survey among 6.000 European pilots showed, the application of the new EASA rules is a timely reminder that fatigue is a reality today in Europe’s cockpits,” says ECA Secretary General Philip von Schöppenthau. “And the real extent of the problem is still not reflected in official data as over 70% of all fatigue occurrences are not reported. The good news, however, is that under the new EU Occurrence Reporting Regulation (Reg. 376/2014) fatigue reporting is no longer a choice but an obligation. Provided that companies have a sound safety culture, based on Just Culture principles, this should encourage pilots and cabin crew to report fatigue, and to do so without fear of reprisals.”

* * *

For further information, please contact:

Dirk Polloczek, ECA President, Tel: +32 2 705 32 93

Philip von Schöppenthau, ECA Secretary General, Tel: +32 2 705 32 93

Note to editors:ECA is the representative body of European pilot associations, representing over 38.000 pilots from across Europe. Website: www.eurocockpit.be

PRESS RELEASE OF SwissALPA, Zurich, 29 January 2016

On January 25th, hosted by ANPAC, the third EAPP meeting was held in Rome, with the participation of European pilots' professional associations of Etihad Airways Partners.

During the meeting several arguments of common interest were discussed with a broad exchange of information about industrial, contractual and professional issues. It was also decided to go further with this initiative which will be structured in a systematic way, with regular meetings whose purpose will be to address union's and industrial steps in order to obtaining the highest level of operational safety as well as uniformity of working conditions, to seize the best career opportunities and to protect employment levels. All attending professional associations shared the idea to involve the Etihad Group starting from next meeting which will be held in Zurich in May 2016.

 

Let us invite you to take part in the FIRST research on Safety Culture that is solely targeting YOU, professional commercial PILOTS.

Join the cooperation of the London School of Economics, the European Commission (Horizon 2020 Future Sky Safety programme), and EUROCONTROL – supported by ECA – and invest 10 minutes of your time to have an impact on aviation for the years to come.

The survey is short, confidential, easy to navigate and touches upon such crucial issues as safety and fatigue management, incident reporting, just culture, or your management’s commitment to safety and to your safety decisions.

Start the survey NOW & don't forget to share it with widely your colleagues.
Help us in helping you! 
 

MEMBERS

AP Logo 16 web espa neu web  SIPA Logo